 |
| Vance Birthplace, Reems Creek, NC 2019. Sprocket Rocket, Fuji Superia 400 |
One of the important aspects of photography is determining how much of a scene will appear in your image. Not only that, but the aspect ratio in which the scene was recorded (whether film or digital), is also an important decision. We often see different aspect ratios available on digital cameras - 1:1 (square) 3:2, 4:3, 16:9, etc. With film, the original aspect ratio of the medium is square 1:1 (24x24 mm for 35 mm, or 6x6 cm in 120), 2x3 (24 x 36mm for 35mm) 3x4 (18 x 24 mm in 35mm half-frame), and in medium format, 6x4.5, 6x7, 6x8, 6x9, and 6 x 17. Large format of course, is 4x5, 5x7, 8x10, etc., but not a part of this discussion. I only mention digital here because you can choose a wider aspect ratio in-camera, but at the cost of pixels. Panoramic format is generally considered to be about twice as wide as high, so an aspect ratio of 16:9 is pretty close in the digital world.
I'm going to discuss 35mm film formats, since that's the most-often used film, and the panoramic options are more affordable. To get more of a landscape in your image, one can go the wide-angle route, using lenses with short focal lengths such as 28mm down to 16mm. My favorite wide focal length is 24mm, because it's not so wide that there is going to be major distortion in perspective, compared to 19mm or 20mm. However, the problem with just using a wide-angle lens is that all of the scene, from sky to foreground is there, unless you crop it out. The better solution to a wide-scape is to use a wider frame of film for the scene.
While a standard 35mm still negative image area is 24 x 36 mm, there are other formats that will affect the area of the scene captured. You may often hear about panoramic format images from 35mm and the typical, easy way to do that is simply to mask a 35mm frame so that it ends up with the negative area that is about 15mm high x 36mm wide. There are many 35mm point and shoots and a few SLRs that do this trick by using a horizontal mask at the top and bottom of the frame. It works quite well, but the downside is that you have also lost some resolution, as you are cropping the 35mm frame to a much smaller area. Making enlargements will often be grainier and less sharp. However, with a wide-angle lens and a good exposure on fine-grained film, the result can be quite acceptable.
 |
| Lake Michigan Dunes, 2007. Ansco Pix Panorama, Delta 400 film |
The better way to present a wider-aspect ratio image is to increase the frame size. To do this, the camera needs to have a wider film gate, and a lens that will work with the wider image circle. There are several options for this, and most of them are expensive. The one camera that's probably most coveted for wide shots is the Hasselblad X-Pan (made by Fujifilm, and also known as the Fujifilm TX-1). The negative area for that camera is 24 x 65mm, almost double the frame width of a typical 35mm. The price of such a camera now is beyond the means for most of us. So, what other choices are there? Well, fear not. My list that follows are low-cost solutions to the panoramic problem.
Ansco Pix Panorama
 |
| The low-fi way to do it. |
 |
| The removeable panoramic mask in the camera |
This is the low-fi, low-cost way to shoot a cropped frame panoramic. Amazingly enough, the images are better than one might expect. They have the toy camera aesthetic, and with the 27mm lens, one gets a true wide-angle for the best result with the cropped 13x36mm negative. The shutter speed is about 1/125 sec, with an F/11 aperture. The panorama mask is removeable so that you can also get standard 24x36mm negatives. Ebay prices are quite low, ranging from $5 to $20. Ansco Pix Panorama cameras are quite common (not made by Ansco, but by Haking in China), so don't overpay for one. Due their easily pocketable size, they provide a fun and easy way to get a panoramic look. On sunny days, ISO 100 films should be just fine, otherwise ISO 200 or 400 films. Kodak's Tmax 100 for b&w would be a good choice for sunny conditions. There are many other 35mm cameras with a panorama mask and wide-angle lens, such as the Ricoh R1, Minolta Freedom Vista, Olympus Trip Panorama, Yashica Microtek Zoom 70, Nikon Lite Touch AF 600, Vivitar IC101, Vivitar T200, Vivitar PN 2011, Pentax UC-1, etc.
 |
| Lower harbor, Marquette, MI. 2014. Yashica Microtek Zoom 70. Konica VX 400 film. |
 |
| Curvilinear, 2013. Nikon F-50D with the pano mask, Tmax 100 film |
Lomography Sprocket Rocket
Lomography's Sprocket Rocket is a great plastic fantastic panoramic camera, which I discussed in 2017. The Sprocket Rocket's real frame size is actually wider than the X-Pan, at 24 x 72mm, or two full 35mm frames. With its 30mm f/11 and f/16 lens and only Instant (1/100) and B shutter speeds, it's limited in the ways that an X-Pan is not. However, it does have a tripod socket, so lengthy exposures are possible. Best of all, it's an easy to carry-around camera that takes pretty darn good images. There's some vignetting, some blurred edges, and a bit of distortion, but I love the images that I get from this camera. I do not care about showing the sprockets, and they are cropped in my scanner frame, anyway. With a 36 exposure roll of film, you will get about 16 shots. I have found that using 200-400 ISO film works great in most conditions. My favorite film to use with this camera is Eastman 5222 (Double-X).
 |
| Cloudgate, Chicago, 2017. Sprocket Rocket, Eastman 5222 |
Holga 135 Pan
The Holga 135 Pan looks much like an elongated Holga 120N. It has a removable 55mm f/8 lens plus an f/236 pinhole lens. The frame size is 24 x 72 mm - again, a tad wider than the X-Pan. It's zone focus, and has two shutter speeds - ca. 1/100 sec and Bulb. It also has a tripod socket and a hot shoe for flash. I have used mine as a pinhole camera and also with the regular lens, and I prefer the 55mm lens. I reviewed the camera back in 2012. I don't think the images are as sharp as the Sprocket Rocket, which is due to the Holga lens. However, if you want to shoot wide with a toy camera, it's one to consider, and it's definitely given me some memorable images.
 |
| Great Lakes Freighter, 2012. Holga 135 Pan, Superia 200 |
 |
| Angell Hall, 2012. Holga 135 pan, Vista 100 film |
Holga 120N 35mm Adapter
I reviewed this solution in 2010, and the resulting frame size is 24 x 55 mm, because you are using the 35mm film in a 120 film body. The biggest drawback in my opinion is the frame counting is tedious, and you can't rewind the film without taking the camera into a dark bag and unloading it. You can also put 35mm in film other medium format cameras, and only a 6x9 format makes this desirable. There are many hacks for doing this, but in most of the instances, you can't rewind the film in camera, which does make this method cumbersome. In addition, the medium-format lenses are typicall "normal" and not wide, so the effect won't be quite the same as a panoramic camera.
 |
| Result from the Holga 35mm adapter, 2010. |
Other Medium Format Camera Adapters -
Using a 35mm adapter in a Pentax 6x7 ought to give nice results if you use it with a wide-angle lens such as the 45 or 55 mm lens. There are 3D printed adapters available online. One photographer has blogged about his impressive results. A Mamiya RB67 can also be modified to work with 35mm, and as with the Pentax 67, there are some online sources for a DIY or finished product. Again, all of these adapters require you to rewind the film back into the cassette by using a dark bag or darkroom. If you already have a Pentax 6x7, then the adapter is a low-cost entry into 35mm panoramas. I plan on trying one out this year.
Horizon Panoramic Camera
 |
| Horizont (Horizon) 35mm swing-lens panoramic camera |
To sum it all up, shooting a scene on a wider negative provides a much different view than a standard 35mm frame, even if a wide-angle lens is used. You can of course, crop any image to get a wider aspect ratio, but cropping is at the loss of image area, whether film or pixels. A wider negative in panoramic format presents the viewer with a more dynamic depiction of a scene.
Of course, you do not have to shoot panoramas horizontally. Vertical shots are really fun, and provide a definite vertically dominant image.
 |
| A triptych from 3 vertical Ansco Pix Panorama shots, 2007. |
About Medium Format Panoramas
If you want to really go with film real estate, you can choose among medium-format cameras, with 6x12 and 6x18 cm being very amazing, and also very expensive. However, there are a number of people that have produced 6x12 cameras using 3D printing. The Kraken 6x12 from Graham Young is a good example. This makes shooting wide in medium format much more accessible. Lomography's Belair also does 6x12 at a reasonable price, but my sample of the camera never seemed to focus accurately, and I really never warmed to to it. Of course, there are Widelux and Noblex cameras that use 120, and are pricey. The cheapest 6x12 would be the Holga 120 Pan that has a 90mm lens and the typical Holga construction. However, it's probably no longer in production. On the higher end of the scale, Linhoff and Fujifilm have the extreme wide panoramic cameras with prices and image quality to match.
More Images!
 |
| The wide-angle image from the Ansco Pix without the panorama mask in place. 2008. |
 |
| April 2017 Festifools. Sprocket Rocket, Kodak Gold 200. |
 |
| Smithfield Cemetery, 2020. Sprocket Rocket, expired Ektachrome Elite 200 |
 |
| Parker Mill, 2010. Holga 35mm adapter. |
 |
| Pergola, Biltmore, 2021. Sprocket Rocket on Ultrafine 400 |
 |
| Landscape, Biltmore, 2021. Sprocket Rocket on Ultrafine 400 |
 |
| Skeleton, 2015. Holga 135 Pan, Tmax 100 |
 |
| Perspective, 2006. Ansco Pix Panorama. Ilford HP-5 |
 |
| Black Rocks, Marquette 2006. Ansco Pix Panorama, Delta 400 |
