A few years ago, I acquired a Kodak Vigilant Six-20. I respooled 120 onto 620 spools, and over the course of 3 years shot 3 rolls with it. The results were always quite good. The Vigilant Six-20 is a 6x9 format camera that came in many versions. The one I used had the best features with the Kodak No. 1 Supermatic Shutter, with speeds from B, T, and 1-1/400 sec, and apertures from f/4.5- f/32. The Kodak Anastigmat Special is a very good lens, too. An excellent lens/shutter combination that allowed 400 ISO film and reasonable shutter speeds.
Another version of the camera, and priced lower, features a Kodak No. 1 Diomatic shutter, with B, T, 1/25, 1/50, and 1/100 sec shutter speeds and a Kodak Anastigmat f/6.3 lens. Definitely not as fast as my camera, and certainly usable with 100-400 ISO film. It’s probably the more common version of the camera, since it was more affordable.
Unfortunately, I’d left the roll of Fomapan 100 in my camera for at least 2 years, with a couple of exposures still to be had. The film had somehow become stuck and would not advance. I ended up having to use pliers to wind the film. I ended up with a “fat roll” which I promptly put into a black container. I think moisture had caused the film to stick and that’s why I could not roll it along by hand.
Now that I have a 4x5 camera, I decided to see if the lens and shutter assembly could be used on my Intrepid 4x5. Now that I know that it covers 4x5, the 101mm lens has become my wide-angle, leaving the shell of the Vigilant lensless.
Here are some shots from that last roll. You can see where the film stuck and acquired some rust in one of the images. I started that roll in the summer 0f 2024, on a photo meetup with the AVL Camera Club. We visited several small breweries next to the Swannanoa River, all of which were destroyed a month later by Hurricane Helene and the flood. The very last photo was taken early this year in the River Arts District, which I guess is fitting.
![]() |
| The light leaks at the top are from the "fat roll" |
![]() |
| You can see the spots on the right side where the film was sticking |
These 6x9 cameras from Kodak are capable of some very good results, and if you don’t mind respooling the 120 film to 620 spools, they represent an inexpensive option for 2 1/4 x 3 1/4 inch negatives. You’ll get 8 shots on a roll. The cameras easily fit into a large pocket and do not weigh much. However, you’ll have to make sure the bellows is free from pinholes - and the black fabric used for the bellows is going to need some liquid rubber or black fabric paint to fix. If the lens is free of haze, and the shutter works, you are good to go.
These cameras were manufactured from 1939-1949, with 10 variants in lens and shutter combinations. The prices at the time ranged from $15 to $49. Today, you should be able to pick up a fully operational example for less than $25, and I certainly would not pay much more.
![]() |
| Another version that I owned in 2011 |












































