For the past few weeks, I have been scanning in 35mm slides from the 1970s. These are not found images from the antique store, but from my camera, from 1975-1980. One of my goals this year is to scan all my slides (or at least the best ones) from my early days of photography, and in the process, remove the slides from the clear plastic sleeves in binders, and transfer to metal storage boxes. My scanner, my trusty Epson V700, does an excellent job with scanning in these colorful little windows to the past, and much more efficiently than using a digital camera to transfer the analog into a digital image. Trust me on this, as I have been scanning slides and negatives in various formats for as many years as we have had scanners available. I also have all the equipment I need to copy via a DSLR. The workflow and the results via the Epson V700 are superior.
 |
| fits in a back pocket |
As I think back, I had to wonder why I shot slides so often after 1975, and my wife reminded me that it was probably the cost. Believe me, the 70s were the last time a person with a low-income could live pretty well, and I was a student with not much money. As it turns out, it was cheaper to shoot slide film back then, as the film and processing was less expensive than color prints. I checked with a 1979 issue of Popular Photography, and the price to process and mount a 20 exposure roll of Ektachrome was less than $2.00, and the price of a roll of Ektachrome was probably around the same price. Some places offered a 20-exposure roll Ektachrome 64 for $3.65, including processing; about the same price as Kodachrome 64. Since I was not in tune with the best offerings via mail (hey, no Internet then!!), I am pretty sure I purchased my film at the local drug store, Woolworth’s or K-Mart, and sent it out for processing. In today’s dollars, that $3.65 translates to just less than $15.00, which would be pretty damn cheap now for a roll of film and processing!
 |
| Feb. 1975. The view from the house I grew up in, Parishville, NY Ektachrome. |
In hindsight, I am happy that I chose to shoot the majority of my images on slides -- the colors have kept pretty well from those 1970s images, and because I didn’t have a lot of extra money, I didn’t shoot like I do now. However, it is also true that I was not a trained photographer with a plan. In looking in these scanned images, I also realized one other thing - I did pretty damn well with the limited equipment that I owned, and my exposures were pretty much on target most of the time. That means I used sunny-16 and intuition for all of my shots.
That brings up the title for this entry - "Don’t Over-think." If I could use a really simple SLR nearly 50 years ago, with slide film, no meter, and 50mm f/2.8 lens, how is it that today, so many people are obsessed with the smallest details in exposures? I see newcomers to photography, especially film, needlessly obsessing over how much to adjust for a given exposure. While my Kodak Pocket Exposure Guide gave me the fundamentals, there is no absolute in photography. Discerning the nuances in light and exposure, especially in landscapes, comes down to experience, but there is always the element of "luck." Maybe I was just lucky many times, and certainly cannot attribute my results to experience. The thing is, I didn’t over-think what I was doing. I believe that over-thinking is what kills creativity and the moment. As I look over these images from 1975-1979, I certainly find ones that could have used more exposure -- and the Exa 1a had a limited number of shutter speeds, including B, and I did not own a tripod. Perhaps if I’d been given a camera like a Praktica SLR with a prism and a full range of shutter speeds, I would have been even more on target, but there’s no way to know that now.
 |
| Feb. 1976, Syracuse Univ. dorms. A typical winter scene in Syracuse, but with less snow. Kodachrome 64. |
 |
| Maine, summer of 1976. Kodachrome 25 |
 |
| Amenia, NY, Jan. 1977. Ektachrome |
 |
| Ice storm, Syracuse, NY. It was so bad we could skate on the sidewalks. Feb. 1976, Kodachrome 64 |
When I replaced that Exa 1a with a Pentax MG in the early 1980s, I finally had a camera with an exposure meter -- but guess what? Relying on that aperture-priority only camera also gave me some bad exposures, because I relied on the camera to get it right, instead of my intuition. Overall, it was a trade-off. Today, I am a much better photographer, and know when to adjust for a given lighting situation. But still, in those spartan days of photography, my youth and inexperience also allowed me to take a chance without worrying about failure. Sometimes I got it perfectly right, and sometimes I didn’t. For example, the photo taken at the SUNY ESF Woodsmen’s event in the fall of 1975 shows me that I wasn’t afraid to get close to the action - the couple on the 2-person crosscut saw with the wood chips flying towards the camera is captured pretty well. I’ll show some other examples with commentary, as well, but those old slides are also peeks back into the 70s of my college years.
 |
| SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry fall Woodsmen's BBQ in Tully, NY. Oct. 1975, Ektachrome. |
 |
| October 1975, Chittenango falls, NY. Kodachrome 64 |
 |
| Syracuse Univ. football game at the old Archbold Stadium, October 1975, Kodachrome 64. |
 |
| Speaking of in the moment... Fall 1976, Syracuse, NY, Ektachrome |
Overthinking your photography is a cruel blow to serendipity. Be in the moment, trust your instincts, and don’t fret if your camera is one-stop off, or you don’t have the best lens money can buy, None of that matters. People obsess over details that don’t matter in the long run. If you have a photography exhibit, nobody will care what lens and camera you used, what film (if it was film), filter, or other attribute used to make the photograph. It’s all about the image.
 |
| Algonquin Mountain summit, Adirondacks, NY Summer 1977, Ektachrome |
In high school, I wanted to be an entomologist, and that’s what I ended up becoming, and doing for 40 years. Nobody told me that I could have been a photographer - and had I taken photography seriously as a profession (which I never thought of), the 1970s would have been the most perfect time to be an aspiring photographer. So, it was never my dream to be a photographer - I just enjoyed it. I look back at those images from the 70s and I am amazed that I did as well as I did with so little knowledge.
 |
| That's me, summer of 1977, in the Adirondacks. My camera, taken by my buddy, Dave Rosher. Ektachrome. |
 |
| January 1977, Twin Lakes, CT. Ektachrome. |
So, perhaps the lesson here is that not only should you not over-think it, but shoot for yourself. Don't worry about what others might think. All too often I see posts by people on places like Reddit (r/photography) who are unsure if they are good enough, or are afraid to take up photography because they lack knowledge. You can’t get better without actually using your camera. Today’s digital and analog wonders will outperform what I used in the 70s by a huge margin. You already have tools at your disposal that will make a perfect exposure 90% of the time. The part that makes the difference is YOU. Get out there and shoot everything that interests you, and over time you will discover what really motivates your photography, and what you enjoy the most. That’s the direction you’ll go.
