Wirgin Edinex (0) |
Some German companies, such as Agfa, produced films as well as cameras. Some, such as Voigtlander go back to the early days of photography (i.e., the Petzval lens was designed in 1840), and the names have outlived the German factories that made the photographic equipment. The myriad of cameras that were produced in Germany in the 20th century is astounding, and if you look through a tome such as McKeown's Cameras (at over 1200 pages), you could spend a long time just looking at German-made cameras. You'll see Adox, Agfa, Balda, Beier, Bentzin, Bilora, Braun, Bulter, Certo, Contessa, Dacora, Diax, Eho-Altissa, Erka-Kamerewerk, Ernemann, Finneta-Werk, Foitzik, Foth, Foto-Quelle, Franka-Werk, Futura Kamerawerk, Genos, Gerlach, Glunz, Goerz, Goldammer, Huttig, ICA, Ihagee, Iloca, Kamera Werkstatten, Kenngott, Kochmann, Krauss, Krugener, Kunik, K.W., Leidolf, Leitz, Linhof, Lippische, Mentor, Merkel, Mimosa, Minox, Montanus, Nagel, Neithold, Nettel, Orionwerk, Pentacon, Plaubel, Porst, Regula, Rietschel, Robot, Rodenstock, Rollei, Ruberg & Renner, Steinheil, Voigtlander, Vredeborch, Welta, Wirgin, Wunsche, Zeh, Zeiss, and Zeiss-Ikon. Some of them you have undoubtedly heard of, but others are relatively obscure names outside of Europe. The manufacturers Balda, Ihagee, Pentacon, Voigtlander, Welta, Wirgin, and Zeiss-Ikon produced a dizzying array of different cameras.
Wirgin began in Wiesbaden, Germany in the 1920s and started producing cameras in the 1930s. To escape the Nazi persecution of Jews, the Wirgin brothers fled Germany to the US around 1938. The factory was largely destroyed during the war, and camera production restarted in 1948, after Henry Wirgin returned to Germany and restarted the company. The company went bankrupt in 1968. Wirgin made about 150 different camera models, with a confusing number of similarly-named 35mm rangefinders and SLRs. The company also made 16 mm subminiature cameras, 120 folding cameras, plate cameras, stereo cameras, as well as a number of zone-focus 35 mm cameras, such as the Edinex, which I am reviewing here.
The Wirgin Edinex (0)
McKeown's lists the early basic Edinex models as type 0, as there are typically no distinguishing names on the models until the Edinex 1 was produced in 1951. The Edinex cameras are surprisingly small due to the telescoping lens tube, rim-set leaf shutters, and compact metal body that opens from the bottom for film loading. They lacked a built-in rangefinder until the Edinex III appeared. There is a tubular post on the top deck of the camera that accepts an accessory rangefinder. My Edinex probably dates from about 1948-1950, as it has a 5 cm Schneider Radionar f/2.9 lens set in a Compur-Rapid rim-set shutter with T, B, 1 - 1/500 sec. Focus is made by turning the front lens cell, which focuses from 3.5 feet to infinity. The viewfinder is tiny, and not ideal for anyone wearing glasses.
Using the camera
First, to load film in the camera, you rotate the release on the bottom plate, which comes all the way off. There is not much space between the pressure plate and the film transport, so you have to carefully load the film. I had to tape the film leader into the metal removable -take-up spool and carefully guide it all into place. To advance the film you must turn a small rotating disk to the left edge of the film winding knob. The arrow shows the proper direction, and once the film starts winding, release the small advance wheel, and the film will wind properly. I found that the frame spacing is very generous, and varies from 4-6 mm vs. about 2 mm for typical 35 mm cameras. The frame counter on the top is manually set.
Since there is no rangefinder in the viewfinder, I just estimated the distance and set the focus on the lens. I could have brought a rangefinder, but I didn't. I used sunny-16 for my exposure guide. To shoot, you must pull out the lens away from the body, and the two very obvious metal knobs on each side of the front assembly are grasped for this. Pull it out until it stops and rotate just a bit clock-wise. Cock the shutter by moving the cocking lever (upper arm) until it catches. The shutter release is the lower arm on the edge of the front assembly. There is also a cable-release port. It really wasn't that hard to operate, and is certainly much better than using an Argus A camera. The full range of shutter speeds makes the camera far more usable with modern films. I loaded the camera with a roll of Ilford Pan-F, rated at ISO 50. To rewind the film, turn the small rotating wheel in the direction indicated (R, clockwise) and turn the rewind knob. There is no double-exposure prevention, so yes, the camera could be used for multiple exposures.
negative sheet - note the wide frame spacing |
I developed the Pan-F, and I am actually quite pleased with the results. Despite being a bit awkward to use, the camera's shutter was accurate, and my focus was never off. I shot it at the Biltmore Estate, and I think this 70-year old camera performed as good as new. Perhaps there really is something to be said for simplicity. No doubt that this camera is compact, and while it isn't going to win the award for elegance, it handles pretty well. To me, the biggest deal-breaker is the bottom loading and the cumbersome film advance sequence. However, the camera obviously beats the US-made Argus A series which use a similar lens arrangement and focus scheme. It's remarkably smaller and lighter than the Kodak Retina-1, which is of similar vintage. The lens and shutter assembly of my Edinex and a Retina -1 are very similar. The Retina-1 likewise lacks a rangefinder, but does also have an accessory shoe for one. Note that the Retina-1 was built by Nagel Kamerwek, so is also a German camera.
I think if you really want a rabbit hole to chase down, take a look at Wirgin Edixa SLR models. So many different models, so many Wirgins!!
RESULTING IMAGES
quick question, you mentioned you had difficulty loading this camera. I own one as well and find that loading even with tape nigh impossible, are there any tricks or perhaps a video of you loading the camera I could watch. This dang thing is leading me to pull my hair out.
ReplyDeleteYou mentioned you have difficulty loading this camera. I own one as well and find it nigh impossible for me to consistently load film into it. Do you have any specific tips on loading it? I tried the tape, but I can never get the film low enough into the body to engage with the teeth.
ReplyDelete